Underwear Photo Ripped From NJ Yearbooks

Strange Weird and Funny news

Underwear Photo Ripped From NJ Yearbooks

Postby Lonestar » 14 Jun 06, 1:17 pm

Now, here is a classic example of overreaction:

www.NJ.Com wrote:PHILLIPSBURG, NJ - The 2006 edition of the yearbook at Phillipsburg High School showed a little bit more than school spirit, and now is a tad thinner for it.

School officials ripped a page out of hundreds of students' yearbooks because it contained a photograph that showed a student's underwear.

The picture on page 224 showed a female student wearing a skirt and sitting on a desk during a play; a bit of her underwear could be seen.

"The picture was questionable," said school superintendent H. Gordon Pethick. "It's the best way I can describe it."

Pethick said a relative of the student asked for the picture to be removed, so officials took it out of hundreds of copies of the yearbook.

Pethick said the page was being reprinted without the questionable picture and students will receive the replacement within a month or so.

Some students at the Warren County school were upset by the removal of the pages, The Express-Times of Easton, Pa., reported in Tuesday's newspapers. Besides the offending photo, seven other drama pictures and nine pictures from a pep rally that were on the same page and its other side were removed.

"First of all, people paid for these. They belong to the students," Phillipsburg High School senior Katie Rockware told the newspaper. "They are expensive. It's like them saying, 'Excuse me, can I just destroy your personal property?' I thought it was so ridiculous."

I guess the worst that my classmates and I had to worry about back in the day, were wiseacres trying to slip "the bird" into the senior group photo [usually done with arms folded, hands on top].  These were discreetly blacked out [one couldn't really tell without looking very closely at the photo] before the photos were distributed.

Yeesh, the world's become so damned thin-skinned since then. Image

Here's a follow up:

www.NJ.Com wrote:Officials Turning A Page On Phillipsburg High Yearbook

Replacement promised. Questionable photo led to ripping-out of Page 224.

PHILLIPSBURG, NJ - School officials have pledged to replace the page that was ripped Monday from hundreds of copies of Phillipsburg High School's yearbook.

But that may not be enough to soothe the hard feelings.

"I think it was just a knee-jerk reaction," Phillipsburg School Board President Paul Rummerfield said. "I asked the question today, who gave the order, and I didn't get a response. I think it's a situation where no one wants to blame someone else, but we are trying to get this resolved."

A picture on Page 224 showed a female student wearing a skirt and sitting at a desk during a play; a bit of her underwear could be seen. Superintendent Gordon Pethick called the photo questionable and said the page was removed after consideration at the high school level.

"I was notified sometime (Monday) morning that there was an issue," he said. "The principal came over with the yearbook and we took a look. We spoke to the student and her parents and they said it wasn't a problem. At that point, I thought the issue was resolved."

Efforts to reach the student and her parents were unsuccessful.

The page was removed from hundreds of seniors' yearbooks Monday afternoon, which were issued to seniors earlier in the day. Pethick said he doesn't know who gave the order to remove the page or if it was removed from every copy. The first he heard of the page being removed was Monday evening, when a parent called to complain about ruining an $80 book.

"I think one of the student's relatives got back to people at the high school," Pethick said. "I'm not sure."

Director of Secondary Education George Chando said he also didn't know who gave the order to remove the page.

Meredith Haydu, a student editor for the yearbook, said students were told the female student's mother asked for the picture to be omitted.

"I understood where (the mother) was coming from," Haydu said. "I can't speak for anyone else, but if a parent asks for it to be removed, the school doesn't have much choice. But I didn't think it was necessary."

Pethick said the school has made arrangements with the yearbook publisher to reproduce the page, though he's not sure if the picture will be removed and replaced or merely edited. The picture was part of a collage on the school's drama club. The other side of the page had photos from pep rallies.

"I don't think it's worth it to go pick up one page," Haydu said. "I'm an athlete, so I wanted to see the pep rally pictures, but now it doesn't seem like it's worth the trip."

Rummerfield said he heard from students who said other pages in the book were ruined as a result of the page being cut out with X-Acto knives. He said he doesn't know what arrangements will be made for students who had other pages cut.

"Hindsight is 20-20," he said. "Maybe they should have confiscated the books and fixed the problem when they weren't in such haste. Some of the kids came up with the idea of just blacking out that area of the photo, but it was rejected."

"The problem is that there are still unaltered books out in the community," he said. "The way it was handled was not an official district position."

Sounds like the school district needs to find another yearbook vendor.  One that has professional photo editors on-staff. Image
Lonestar / EtoileSolitaire / Einsamerstern / EstrellaSolitaria / ОдинокаяЗвезда

* * * * * * * * * *

*PLEASE VISIT!* Lonestar Enterprises [click]
User avatar
Lonestar
 
Posts: 5159
Joined: 22 May 05, 2:29 pm
Location: Dallas, TX USA


Postby MickeyMouse » 15 Jun 06, 1:12 pm

Hell yea, a little upskirt never hurt anyone.  :D
User avatar
MickeyMouse
 
Posts: 285
Joined: 09 Jun 06, 2:11 pm


Postby cerina » 15 Jun 06, 1:38 pm

What a fiasco all over a little glance of gusset? The world is being taken over by small minded idiots.  :eek:
User avatar
cerina
 
Posts: 52773
Joined: 14 Jul 05, 8:17 pm
Location: Thuththex by the Thea (female)


Postby Napper » 15 Jun 06, 6:15 pm

cerina wrote:What a fiasco all over a little glance of gusset? The world is being taken over by small minded idiots.  :eek:


I agree Cerina.
Here's an example from my own experience..

A few years ago the school I attended as a lad (and the one all my kids attended) was being replaced by a State-of-the-art new building on the same campus.
Being Chair of the School Board at that time and knowing that many of my contemporaries were still in this area and had kids at this school, I suggested to the Head that it might be interesting to compile a history of the school before the old building was demolished. I even spoke with the then Director of Education, who gave me a lot of help, contact wise.
This agreed, I set about contacting old classmates and former teachers, asking for their memories and any photographs they could lend me. I put a notice in the Education Authority's in-house newsletter to the same effect.
The response was amazing as the word got around... I was getting letters and phone calls from teachers I hadn't seen since I was 17 yrs old. Photographs and other memorabilia arrived by the boxload and we started to compile a CD based history of the old place. (The intention was to sell it at Parents' Nights for a couple of quid for school funds.) and a "master" copy was produced.

Unfortunately some bright spark in the City's legal department pulled the plug on the idea and would not allow us to distribute the CD.....

The Reason?......

"Paedophiles might get a hold of it and it does contain pictures of children, we can't take the risk....blah, blah..... can't you produce a book?"

Paedophiles can't read? If they're sick enough to "use" the pictures on the CD, they've probably worked out how to use a scanner on a book, No? ----- was my response.

My pleas fell on not deaf, but covered ears. They had made their Executive decision ( covered their arses from the highly unlikely threat of possibly being sued)

The CD has been seen by a few ex-pupils and staff - but that's all. What a waste of a lot of people's time and generosity!

(PS. I know who the legal eagle is....... and I have this big stick with a nail in it................. :twisted: ) :mrgreen:
User avatar
Napper
 
Posts: 5401
Joined: 21 Nov 05, 10:32 pm
Location: Glasgow UK


Postby cerina » 16 Jun 06, 3:27 am

That is the same reason parents aren't allowed to video school nativity plays and that kind of thing ... because they might get into the hands of paedophiles.
I have never been able to attend any of they plays my nephews and nieces have been in and, at one time, used to enjoy watching the videos of the even. That has been stopped now, although the school do employ a photographer to take the 'official' photographs ... the ones that can be sold and make some money.
User avatar
cerina
 
Posts: 52773
Joined: 14 Jul 05, 8:17 pm
Location: Thuththex by the Thea (female)


Postby MickeyMouse » 16 Jun 06, 5:16 am

cerina wrote:That is the same reason parents aren't allowed to video school nativity plays and that kind of thing ... because they might get into the hands of paedophiles.
I have never been able to attend any of they plays my nephews and nieces have been in and, at one time, used to enjoy watching the videos of the even. That has been stopped now, although the school do employ a photographer to take the 'official' photographs ... the ones that can be sold and make some money.


I wouldnt care if those videos/pictures get into the hands of phedophiles as long as i dont know about it and if they stay away from my kids.  :?

Guess thats a safe compromise for me.
User avatar
MickeyMouse
 
Posts: 285
Joined: 09 Jun 06, 2:11 pm


Postby Napper » 16 Jun 06, 9:19 am

MickeyMouse wrote:I wouldnt care if those videos/pictures get into the hands of phedophiles as long as i dont know about it and if they stay away from my kids.  :?

Guess thats a safe compromise for me.




Oh dear.....
User avatar
Napper
 
Posts: 5401
Joined: 21 Nov 05, 10:32 pm
Location: Glasgow UK


Postby MickeyMouse » 16 Jun 06, 12:07 pm

:lol:

Knew that would come back at me and snap my arm right off  :razz:

Im just saying its not worth our time preventing something that might not or is unlikely to happen, c'mon its just a little view of panties, no harm right?


:oops:
User avatar
MickeyMouse
 
Posts: 285
Joined: 09 Jun 06, 2:11 pm


Postby Napper » 16 Jun 06, 5:30 pm

MickeyMouse wrote: c'mon its just a little view of panties, no harm right?

:oops:



I  agree. No harm at all in that.


MickeyMouse wrote:...its not worth our time preventing something that might not or is unlikely to happen..


OK, so we let paedophiles away with it as long as they stay away from my kids?
I disagree.

So in summary:

Inadvertant glimpse of panties = acceptable.

Paedophiles = bad anywhere.

How's that?

:mrgreen:
User avatar
Napper
 
Posts: 5401
Joined: 21 Nov 05, 10:32 pm
Location: Glasgow UK


Postby MickeyMouse » 17 Jun 06, 8:59 am

Okok you got me.  :razz:

I agree thier bad ANYWHERE but its not for sure itll get into thier hands, thier just being over protective.

:bootyshake:  :whip:
User avatar
MickeyMouse
 
Posts: 285
Joined: 09 Jun 06, 2:11 pm


Postby Napper » 17 Jun 06, 5:41 pm

:twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


I'm outta this thread......for a number of reasons.
User avatar
Napper
 
Posts: 5401
Joined: 21 Nov 05, 10:32 pm
Location: Glasgow UK


Postby inflated ego » 14 Jul 06, 7:20 am

Attention:  All owners of the 1977 "Huskie" please go to the principal's office now.
Repeat: All owners of the 1977 "Huskie" please go to the principal's office now.
User avatar
inflated ego
 
Posts: 3
Joined: 13 Jul 06, 7:56 am
Location: searching for reality


Postby IslandgurlPatty » 14 Jul 06, 8:26 am

lol gawd....how horrible...it showed a bit of underwear...omg....


Image


Some people are so busy trying to look moral that they lose all objectivity. lol..
User avatar
IslandgurlPatty
 
Posts: 349
Joined: 16 Nov 05, 7:18 pm
Location: Texas



Return to In the News



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 0 guests